Dilisights

Build the property. Qualify the reader. Hand it to one client.

  1. We build a reference property from a document that is already public — a maker's own manual, a parts catalog, or a federal data file.
  2. An industrial buyer finds it while looking for a specific answer, and reads it.
  3. If the answer is that the work needs someone to do it, we offer one plain route to ask.
  4. We check the submission against the client's service area and scope before anything is sent.
  5. It goes to one client, with the source property and the arrival time attached.

How a lookup page answers

The page ships with the phrases and the cross-references written at build time, from that one book. A query is matched in the browser against those written phrases. Nothing is sent to a language model, nothing is generated on the fly, and a code that is not in the book comes back empty rather than guessed at.

That is deliberate. A reference page that invents a fault code is worse than no page at all — and a property that gets its facts wrong stops attracting the buyers we sell to.

How an inquiry is qualified

Everything that fails a check is dropped rather than passed on at a discount. An inquiry we throw away costs us money; sending it anyway would cost us the client.

What we hand over

The buyer's own description of the job, the qualifying fields, the location, the timing, the property it came from and the arrival time. In the format your team already works in, agreed before the first batch.

What you need on your side

Your service area, the jobs you want and the ones you do not, and one person who will read and call back. That is the whole setup.

Checking us before you pay

Ask for a small first batch on terms you are comfortable with, and trace every inquiry back to the property it came from. If an inquiry does not hold up, say so and we remove it from the invoice. If a cite on one of our reference pages is wrong, open the maker's own PDF and check it against the page number we printed — that is the test, and we would rather be corrected than trusted.